Learning a language to improve internal communication

A language you can’t speak won’t help you communicate with your team. It will only serve to make you feel isolated and out of touch. This is why learning a new language is an excellent way to improve internal communication and build stronger relationships with colleagues, partners, or customers.

Many companies and organizations today use a combination of face-to-face meetings, email, Skype and other video conferencing tools to communicate with their employees. However, there are still a large number of people who prefer to do their work in person or over the phone. If you are one of these people, it is important that you learn another language to improve your internal communication. See also, learn English.


Learning a language is the first step towards having better internal communication at work. But there are many ways to do it, and all of them have their pros and cons. In this article, we will explore how different kinds of language learning can help you improve your team’s productivity and team spirit.

The human brain can process more than two thousand different sounds and words at the same time. Thus, it is no surprise that bilinguals outperform non-bilinguals on many cognitive tasks. However, what is interesting is that a study found that learning a second language could actually improve an individual’s communication skills within the workplace.

Why is effective workplace communication important?

If a team is unable to communicate as efficiently, dysfunctional norms may arise among members. An ineffective income and profit report shared across the world could cause withdrawal of investment in your business and possibly lead to bankruptcy or closure down the road. Information overload can be a result of poor internal communications that bring up unethical practices such as favoritism, unprofessional behavior, intolerance among team members who are working together towards common goals (Vietnam War example).


The ability to communicate effectively within your team can have a significant effect on how successful you are. Leaders who understand the impact of quality internal communications will ensure that every individual has access to accurate and relevant information, as well as that he/she is able to process this data in an efficient manner. Additionally, leaders with great communication skills know how besting between teams or departments within their organization should be done if the desired outcome involves multiple people working together towards different goals. If a leader has poor communication skills, relevant information and instructions may be misinterpreted leading to disturbance of the desired outcome (or more often than not: no one even knows what is going on!).

The effectiveness of leaders with informal communication abilities in their ability to effectively communicate can raise questions that go beyond internal corporate goals or performance metrics. I will discuss some areas where informal-level interactions among teams can have immediate impacts on larger peace efforts or negotiations.

Ethics and the process of negotiating an agreement with multiple parties is a huge problem in international negotiations. Informational overload can lead to ethical disputes or mistakes that could bring up major objections to buy-in (or support). Family members of heavy world trade negotiators face issues such as corruption, lies about perceived conflicting interests for personal gain for individual family members, inflated/unnecessarily high priced prices sometimes even by vendors who have previously needed an economic bailout, etc., which lead to steep political and economic problems in a country whose people are usually nice and peaceful.


Case study: Daniele at Genesys

While on a delegation in Haiti, I had the opportunity to meet their staff representative from Daniele. Though he was not formally “in charge” of this negotiation process at that time, having met him months before and during my visit I no longer needed to ask for explanations or details about these dealings. He showed concern for everyone’s issues as well as made sure we all were comfortable without being intrusive (by his presence – if any need arise by a specific issue, he relocates to another room or cabin). The night before returning home, which is difficult for Haitians because of the time difference between Haiti and Australia due to daylight savings (Ocoee Time Zone), we had intensive negotiations with representatives from the US Chamber of Commerce. We met in an informal discussion while they worked at their computers. As most people tend to do when stressed, drinking alcohol was on tap even though it wasn ‘t meant in anger, but just to ease tensions. Everything went well while they were surfing the net and giving us drinks (with great hospitality on our part) until we heard a comment that luckily hadn’t gotten out of hand. The US Chamber President did not want Daniele to sell goods through their organization for fear it could hurt his business due to prejudicial views on trade partners or simple protectionism based sells by this company’s administration and staff. So, after the conversation we discussed mechanisms which could be put in place to legally defend that Daniele is not “doing anything wrong”. After rethinking the situation it took us a while to settle on an agreement where they would cover all costs should there be any legal issues down under. All this happened outside of Canada’s political system: See how things can work when politics only enters as concerns are created by sneaky and corrupt business practices. The US Secretary of State had her fair share of diplomatic strifes as well as the Canadian embassy in Washington and so on – we only wanted to minimise any troubles for Daniele. Moreover, it was a relief after all worries about contingencies set by Canada’s Foreign Ministry – talking with those guys would have been unthinkable! In summary, our visits were marvellous and connected us with others who are responsible for changing things: Bro c, Mr David Rosato, Dave Batchelor, Mette Johannessen and so on… Speaking of creative people: Is living with a dyslexic person like Daniele an oppurtunity to learn how these things work? Ideas flow freely from both sides and we have many plans for the future: They are great! Are you not curious about what these communications involve or why this information is censored by some parts as well as the official channels? For example, here is what we may have in mind for a future project. Will it account and help to lighten up some standards that are too rigidly applied by lazy complainers while at the same time give us an opportunity to see how much thought can be put into social engineering or “black hat” tactics?


All in all, it was a good experience and we were impressed by the willingness of the people to help us: They really want to make a difference. There is no point in telling them what they should do – they will know what to do. It is just that they are not all working together yet, so it’s like trying to find one lost object in a big crowd of people… As I am sure you know, there are other ways of helping as well as individual ways. You May Like What Is Communicative English.